
The New World Order Is Not a Conspiracy Theory
4
129
0

"The elephant in the room is not the GOP elephant, it is the New World Order elephant." --Dean Odle 2020
"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." --George Brock Chisholm, Director of the U.N. World Health Organization, Psychiatry 1946
“The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a New World Order because the global order is changing again. And the institutions that worked so well in the post-World War 2 era for decades, they need to be strengthened and some have to be changed.”[1] --Vice President Joe Biden Export-Import Bank Conference Washington DC April 5, 2013
"All nations must come together to build a stronger GLOBAL REGIME." --President Barack Obama, Prague Speech April 2009
Regime: a government, especially an authoritarian one. --Google Dictionary
In February 1950, James P. Warburg testified in hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate 81st Congress, 2d Session on resolutions relative to the United Nations charter, Atlantic Union, and making the United Nations a “World Federation” or world government. James Warburg was “…well known for being the financial adviser to Franklin D. Roosevelt. His father was banker Paul Warburg, member of the Warburg family and "father" of the Federal Reserve system”[2] (which was a big part of the New World Order bankers plan to get control of the United States).
“I am James P. Warburg, of Greenwich, Conn., and am appearing as an individual.
I am aware, Mr. Chairman, of the exigencies of your crowded schedule and of the need to be brief, so as not to transgress upon your courtesy in granting me a hearing.
The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.
We shall have WORLD GOVERNMENT, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest…
Mr. Chairman, I am here to testify in favor of Senate Resolution 56, which, if concurrently enacted with the House, would make the peaceful transformation of the United Nations into a world federation the avowed aim of United States policy. The passage of this resolution seems to me the first prerequisite toward the development of an affirmative American policy which would lead us out of the valley of death and despair.”[3]
In 1975, CFR insider and former Judge Advocate General of the US Navy Admiral Chester Ward wrote in his book entitled Kissinger on the Couch about the primary goal of the Council on Foreign Relations:
“[The CFR has as a goal] submergence of US sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government… this lust to surrender the sovereignty and independence of the United States is pervasive throughout most of the membership… In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as ‘America First.’”[4]
“In 1928, Clark M. Eichelberger became director of the Midwest office of the League of Nations Association (LNA). He served as a consultant to the League of Nations Secretariat. By 1934, he was national director of the League of Nations Association. In 1945, the association's name changed to the American Association of the United Nations (AAUN), and Eichelberger served as its executive director until 1964, when he became Vice President of the United Nations Association of the USA (UNAUSA) through 1968.
In 1945, Eichelberger served as consultant to the United States delegation to the San Francisco Conference and was a member of the committee which created the first draft of the charter of the United Nations. Alger Hiss served as Acting Secretary during that meeting. In 1939, he co-founded and directed the Commission to Study the Organization of Peace (CSOP). In 1964, he became its chairman. In 1968, he became executive director (until 1974).
Eichelberger was a prolific writer and used such occasions to advocate for the United Nations as a means of achieving world peace. In 1939, he wrote:
‘The road to peace for the United States and for the rest of the nations is to be found in a highly developed society of nations (UN). Some future generation may live in a world in which national sovereignty counts for much less than it does today. In it there will be new forms of group loyalty and patriotism.’”[5]
Eichelberger was an advocate for the United Nations from its’ beginning until his death. He was on the committee that created the first draft of the charter of the United Nations. In 1949, he authored an article entitled “World Government via the United Nations” for esteemed journal The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Volume 264 ‘World Government’ July 1949.
In the article, he writes, “The answer to the subject of ‘World Government via the United Nations’ can, according to my point of view, be given easily. World government has evolved and will evolve through the United Nations as the people are willing for it to evolve. The process has already begun…Those who believe in world government want essentially a few definite things. First, the law of the world community MUST BE ABOVE THE SOVEREIGNTY of the individual nation. There must be a supreme law against war. Second, there must be an executive authority strong enough to use police force or whatever measures are necessary to preserve the peace… The United Nations is far from a league—it is the beginning of world government. If it were not for the veto, the Security Council would contain all the aspects of executive authority that the World Federalists have advocated.”[6]
In the same edition of this journal, there was an article entitled, “A Plea for World Government” by (then President of the World Federalists) Cord Meyer Jr. Under the heading ‘Transform the U.N.’, Meyer wrote, “The fact that neither American military power nor the U.N.’s present structure can in the long run preserve peace or end the arms race has led us, the federalists, to advocate immediate steps to strengthen the U.N. and to transform it, giving it the power of a federal government STRONGER THAN ITS’ MEMBERS and capable of protecting them as against each other.” And if you think that this was some kind of ideological fantasy of utopian socialist, think again! Meyer goes on to state how his World Federalists had sixty men in the U.S. House of Representatives and eight United States Senators who were “…informed and active on our side.” They were also pushing state legislatures across America to call for a National Constitutional Convention “…for the purpose of making such amendments as are necessary to enable the United States to ratify and enter a world federal structure.”[7]
Of course, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC want us all to believe that this “New World Order one-world government” subject is just a far right-wing “conspiracy theory.” But you will see why they all parrot each other and always come down on the side of anti-America socialism. The reason for this Russian/communist collusion of the American press finds its’ roots in a Deep State CIA takeover called Operation Mockingbird and Operation Northwoods.
Let us jump back to the former President of the World Federalists Association and author of the above-mentioned article “A Plea for World Government” Cord Meyer Jr. He was the grandson of the chairman of the New York State Democrat Committee. He became an aide to Harold Stassen at the 1945 San Francisco United Nations Conference on International Organization. “Meyer started working for the Central Intelligence Agency, joining the organization in 1951 at the invitation of Allen Dulles.[8] At first he worked at the Office of Policy Coordination under former OSS man, Frank Wisner. In 1953, Meyer came under attack by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which claimed he was a security risk for having once stood at the same podium of a "notorious leftist", and refused to give him a security clearance. An internal CIA inquiry summarily dismissed the claims.
According to Deborah Davis in her 1979 book Katharine the Great, Meyer became the "principal operative" of Operation Mockingbird, a plan to secretly influence domestic and foreign media. Meyer befriended James Angleton, who in 1954 became the CIA's counter-intelligence chief. From 1954 until 1962, Meyer led the agency's International Organizations Division. Meyer headed the Covert Action Staff of the Directorate of Plans from 1962.
On 18 December 1956, Meyer's nine-year-old son, Michael, was hit by a car and killed. Meyer and his wife Mary divorced in 1958. On 12 October 1964, his former wife Mary was shot dead by an unknown assailant alongside the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal. Her sister and brother-in-law Benjamin C. Bradlee, later the executive editor of The Washington Post, caught Angleton breaking into Pinchot's residence. Angleton apparently was looking for Mary Meyer's diary that allegedly contained details of a love affair with John F. Kennedy, the recently assassinated U.S. President. From 1967 to 1973, Meyer was Assistant Deputy Director of Plans under Thomas Karamessines, and from 1973 to 1976 was CIA station chief in London.”[9]
My first question upon discovering this man was “How does a known World Federalist (who openly pushed for surrender of American sovereignty and arms to make the United Nations a world government) get recruited by the head of the CIA Allen Dulles and then rise to prominent positions in the CIA? My second question was “How does Cord Meyer Jr. (investigated by the FBI because of his known ties to “notorious leftists”) become the lead on a rogue CIA operation to infiltrate and take over all media outlets in America to use as their propaganda tool? The answer to those questions is easy if you understand the “elites” long term agenda. But did they succeed?
Well, let’s take a look at one of the most influential and beloved individuals in the history of the American news media…the one and only Walter Cronkite. He was the anchorman for the CBS Evening News for 19 years (1962–1981). Cronkite was also known as "the most trusted man in America." According to USA TODAY columnist Robert Bianco, Walter Cronkite was the “…predominant news voice in America.” But, ten years before his death, Cronkite received the 1999 Norman Cousins' Global Governance Award from the World Federalist Association (name changed in 2004 to Citizens for Global Solutions). Both Norman Cousins and his World Federalist Association have been advocates for a world government for decades. Walter Cronkite was introduced by the then president of the WFA, John B. Anderson (a former U.S. Congressman from Illinois and 1980 Presidential Candidate). Mr. Anderson stated in his introduction, "World government is the structure necessary for global justice...You sir have been a lifelong advocate of this principle."
In his speech to accept the award in 1999, Walter Cronkite stated:
"I’m in a position to speak my mind and, by god, I’m going to do it. (Audience laugh uproariously)
It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace.[emphasis mine]
First, we Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That’s going to be for many a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order…. We cannot defer this responsibility to posterity. Democracy, civilization itself, is at stake. Within the next few years, we must change the basic structure of our global community from the present anarchic system of war … to a new system governed by a democratic U.N. Federation.
Today, we must develop federal structures on a global level to deal with world problems. We need a system of enforceable world law, a democratic federal world government. Most important, we should sign and ratify the treaty for a permanent international criminal court. That is now at the core of the world federalist movement’s drive. That court will enable the world to hold individuals accountable for their crimes against humanity.
And the third point: Just consider if you will, after 55 years, the possibility of a more representative and democratic system of decision-making at the UN. This should include both revision of the veto in the Security Council and adoption of a weighted voting system in the General Assembly.
Some of you may ask, although I think most of you know the answer, why the Senate is not ratifying these important treaties, and why the Congress is not even paying UN dues, even as with the American rejection, so many years now, the League of Nations after World War I.
Our failure to live up to our obligations to the United Nations is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government but only when the Messiah arrives. (Derisive laughs from the audience.) He (Robertson) wrote, 'Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil.'
Well, join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan."[10]
